Opiate Addiction Treatment in the United States
So we’ve spent the past week or so talking about drug laws and criminal charges and sort of exploring the laws themselves and what they mean for us, and today we’re going to talk about opiate addiction treatment laws specifically.
The Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000
In 2000, the Federal government passed The Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000. This landmark law allowed qualified physicians to prescribe and dispense narcotics – in particular, Suboxone – to their patients for the purpose of treating dependency on opiates. (Suboxone is a drug that is used only for the treatment of opiate addiction.) This was a dramatic shift, for previously, this treatment could only take place in drug treatment centers. The law allowed physicians to dispense Suboxone treatments in the privacy of their own practice, which was a boon for patients who didn’t want the stigma attached with going to a treatment center.
The Catch
Of course, this law wasn’t without a catch. There was a limit of 30 patients placed on the number of people that could be treated per practice. So, regardless of how many qualified physicians were employed by a particular practice, the maximum number of patients that practice could treat was thirty. This was the major disadvantage to the 2000 law, but it was still a leap forward for opiate treatment.
The Catch is Uncaught
Then, in 2005, public law 109-56 was passed. This law was an amendment to The Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000, and removed the 30 patient limit on medical practices. The limit was still imposed on individual physicians, but it was lifted for medical practices as a whole. Because of this change, practices with more than one doctor had the ability to treat more than 30 patients at a time.
Finally, in 2006, another law was created that allowed certified physicians to prescribe Suboxone to treat up to 100 patients at a time, a huge jump from the previous limit of 30 patients. In order to do this, the physician would have to submit an “intent” notification to the department of Health and Human Services. This law provided a huge boost to help doctors treat patients since they were no longer shackled by such a low patient limit.
What’s your opinion on this patient limit? Should they deregulate methadone in the same way?


September 15th, 2008 at 9:35 pm
I BELIEVE ANY PHYSICIAN THAT CAN EASE THE ADDICTION SO THE PATIENT CAN BE ABLE TO GO BACK TO DOING EVERY DAY TO DAY TASK..TO BE ABLE TO THINK CLEARLY.. SO THEY ARE ABLE TO CARE FOR THEM SELF AN OTHERS.. TO ALLOW HOPE.. AN LIGHT IN .. TO KNOW THEY STAND A CHANCE.. THEN YES.. LET ME SAY IT AGAIN.. YES LET THESE PHYSICIANS TREAT… EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM…RATHER THEN TURN THEM AWAY AT THE DOOR…IT IS HARD ENOUGH FOR SOMEONE TO ASK FOR HELP.. BUT TO HAD ASKED FOR IT .. AN TOLD YOUR ODDS OF GETTING HELP ARE SLIM TO NONE BECAUSE OF…WE ALL KNOW THERE ARE A LIST OF REASONS… THAT PERON WILL NOW GO TAKE SOMETHING ELSE .. EVEN STRONGER.. CHANCES ARE MORE OF IT.. THINKING EASE THE PAIN.. OR THERES NO HOPE..SOME CASES LEADING TO DEATH.. I SAY GIVE THE ALL PHYSICIAN’S THE RIGHT AN THE ABILTY TO TREAT THERE PATIENTS!!!!!!!!!( ADDICTION CAN LEAD TO COMMA /DEATH) TO PUT A # ON HOW MANY… THE ? THE DOCTOR HAS TO ASK IS WHO IS WORTH SAVING..THEY ARE BEING FORCED WEATHER THEY KNOW IT OR NOT… PLAY GOD/ TO PICK AN CHOSE..(ADDICTION CAN LEAD TO COMMA/ DEATH)AN THE LAW LOOKS TO BE PLAYING A BIG PART IN IT..????????HOW MANY WILL THEY ALLOW TO BE TREATED THIS YEAR BY A PHYSICIAN… IN WHICH STATES/ HOW MANY WILL CARRY THAT LIC. TO DO SO ??????? SORE SUBECT AS YOU CAN SEE , SAD AS WELL. I’M EVEN CURIOUS TO WHOAM EVER IT IS THAT IS HANDLING THE DRUG LAW IF THEY GET A WAGER GOING YOU KNOW A SIDE BET TO IF ADDICTION IS ON THE RISE.. OR IF THE DEATHS TOLLAS ARE..I CAN BET IF THEY DON’T ALLOW THE PHYSICIAN TO TREAT.. THEN YEAH..IT WILL BE